The Nuclear Taboo of American Sea Power

Mackenzie Eaglen, Research Fellow for National Security at the Heritage Foundation explores the current plight and pitfalls of US maritime power. Eaglen explains the air-sea battle concept and the joint efforts involved to make this a success. You’ve stated in published articles that America is a ‘maritime power’, but this edge is on the decline – what are the implications to America for loss of sea power? Military and economic strength are mutually reinforcing. The overwhelming majority of world commerce moves virtually unmolested across the great expanse of the maritime commons. Protection of the global commons is a vital national interest of the United States. The U.S. Navy’s global presence has added immeasurably to U.S. economic vitality and to the economies of America’s friends and allies, not to mention those of its enemies. World wars, which destroyed Europe and much of East Asia, have become almost incomprehensible thanks to the "nuclear taboo" and preponderant American sea power. If these conditions are removed, all bets are off. A preponderant naval power occupies a unique position in the global order, a special seat at the table, which when unoccupied creates conditions for instability. What role might Long Range Strike developments play in strengthening this pitfall? The fleet of the future will require increased network capability, longer range, and increased persistence. The U.S. is quickly losing its monopolies on guided weapons and the ability to project power. Precision munitions and battle networks are proliferating, while advances in radar and electro-optical technology are increasingly rendering stealth less effective. The Pentagon roles and missions review should direct an after action item to develop a long-range technology road map, including a science and technology plan and a research and development plan for the Air Force. This should broadly outline future investments, capabilities, and requirements, including a new air superiority fighter jet, low-observable capabilities beyond stealth, more capable land attack, and air-to-air missiles, next-generation rotary wing aircraft, satellite recapitalization, directed energy and electromagnetic weapons, nanotechnology and solid-state and fiber lasers, biotechnologies, and advanced cyber technologies. Explain the air-sea battle concept and the joint efforts involved to make this a success? Among other priorities, the operational concept must identify areas of needed investment, identify new training and doctrine, and guide infrastructure requirements around the world. When the Cold War ended, certain missions—including anti-shipping strikes and open-ocean anti-submarine warfare—were seen as no longer important. Some capabilities, such as the ability to launch anti-ship cruise missiles from submarines, were also abandoned. The U.S. Navy must reinvigorate its research and development efforts. Currently, there are no new surfaces or subsurface combatants in the design phase—an unprecedented situation. To avoid such a scenario, Congress should require the development of a comprehensive naval research and development plan that exploits advances in such technologies as unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned submersibles, and space systems. The U.S. Pacific Air Force must keep on track its modernization program. Low observable aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles will remain vital to air-sea battle, as will electronic warfare capabilities. What A2/AD capabilities are the most concerning to the US currently? For the past several decades, the Chinese military has been steadily improving its operational capabilities. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has expanded some of its forces (e.g., ballistic missiles), improved its command and control, and begun implementing joint operations. It has also begun improving its air and naval forces. The PLAN has been maintaining the size of its submarine force while it modernizes the fleet and augmenting its aerial maritime strike capability. What the substantial numbers of submarines and fast attack craft, coupled with development of the DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile and anti-ship cruise missiles, do suggest is that the PLA may be pursuing an asymmetric strategy at sea: one of anti-access/area denial.

The Nuclear Taboo of American Sea Power

Upcoming Events

Military Simulation Training Summit

Homeland Security Week

Wildfire Technology Summit

Air Dominance Summit

Armored Vehicles USA Conference

Next Generation UAS

Follow Us

Latest Webinars

Responsible and Transparent Approaches to AI in Biometric Algorithm

Securing the Defence Industrial Base: Mitigating Risk and Delivering Resiliency in Physical and Digital Supply Chains

Treatment Option for Two Subsets of Challenging to Treat Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

Recommended

Facial Recognition: Art or Science?

Facial Recognition: Art or Science?

NORAD’s Perspective on Radar: Interview with Lieutenant General Pierre St-Amand...

OBIM's View On Biometrics

Controlling the Waters Biometric Security at Port Everglades

Trump and Tricare: How will the new administration affect Military Healthcare?

Trump and Tricare: How will the new administration affect Military Healthcare?

How Will the New Administration Affect Military Healthcare?

Unmanned Solutions for Ground Combat Systems: with Johns Hopkins University

CERDEC On Energy Storage Solutions

The Future of Biometric Technology With U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services...

Military Healthcare: Presentation Case Study

FIND CONTENT BY TYPE

IDGA COMMUNITY

ADVERTISE WITH US

JOIN THE IDGA COMMUNITY

The Nuclear Taboo of American Sea Power

Upcoming Events

Follow Us

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter

Latest Webinars

Recommended

FIND CONTENT BY TYPE

IDGA COMMUNITY

ADVERTISE WITH US

JOIN THE IDGA COMMUNITY